Miles behind the All Blacks
Photo: www.sarugby.com / Touchline |
Jake White has mentioned the performance of his backs after each match. He should examine that of his forwards more closely.
I often talk about how loosies should be tied together with an invisible piece of string. Loosies hunt in packs. The French pairing of Nyanga and Remy Martin showed the Boks how it is done last night. Schalk tried hard. Our man of the previous two games, Juan Smith, was strangely quiet. And Jacques Cronje was his usual failure at international level.
South Africa is desperately missing Joe van Niekerk. Wikus van Heerden would have been a better option in the loose trio. That would have meant that Juan Smith would have had to move to eighth man. Or Solly Tsibilyka, meaning Schalk Burger would have had to move to eighth man. Frankly, both of those options would have been better, and, I must say, pretty exciting.
But just as loosies hunt in packs, so tight fives need to work as a unit. Someone on the Keo site commented that he hoped the Bok tight five would be covered by "die spreekwoordlike kombers, maar teen die Walise het dit gelyk asof Percy dit gedra het toe hy by die kant van die veld gewag het" (the metaphorical blanket, but against the Welsh, it looked as though Percy was wearing it while he waited at the side of the field). Last night it looked as though the blanket had got completely lost. The tight five were abysmal as a unit. They struggled to keep momentum going in the scrums, they were pathetically absent in getting stuck in at the rucks and mauls and they failed to consolidate line out ball. All this resulted in massive pressure on their half backs, and shocking ball for the backs. When you get the ball on the back foot, you usually have to bash it up or kick for position. Our inexperienced half backs chose to put up the high ball - with the help from Montgomery.
While Matfield and Botha are the best lineout combination in the world, they are piss-poor in the tight-loose. Jake White once sent Matfield home from Australia due to his patchy contribution. Maybe it is time he had another one of those talks.
Os is an injured man. He talked about the management of his crocked knee in the SA Rugby magazine. He is not managing it. Watch him between scrums and you will see a noticeable limp. The bullocking runs of yesteryear are distant history, and SA should look elsewhere for the 2007 world cup.
John Smit looks tired and it is influencing his ability to contribute and marshal his troops on the field. I believe Schalk or Monty should be given greater vice captain responsibilities. It would allow Smit to be rested or substituted. After the Tri-Nations we know Smit is our best, but the pressure has taken its toll.
Our half backs were a disaster. I am a big fan of bringing in Bosman as a bet on the future. But Michael Claasens is not international class. Add to the woes the dismal efforts of the forwards in protecting him and the guy didn't have a chance. I cannot see how Jake White could talk of making space for Claasens due the benefit of keeping his Free State combination together. Hardly a combination - Bosman has hardly played with the first fifteen. The writing was on the wall early on, and Jake White's shocking record of poor use of substitutions continued - Bolla should have come on.
I was so happy to see Monty's driving tackle on Thomas Castaignède early on. Monty's defence has been robust over these last two matches. But it was to a false sign of things to come. Monty's kicking out of hand and at posts was poor. He was not as abysmal as some have made out and hardly worth the mention Jake White gave his lack of practice leading up to this match. Look elsewhere, Jake. But all the same, not the performance we needed from the senior pro. Towards the end of the match, Monty started to take the ball at flyhalf, and the line looked instantly better. It would have been good to see more of this throughout the match. In fact, when Monty put up his hand after Pretorius' injury, he should have been given the flyhalf job. It would have been good for a player looking to contribute more, and perhaps the better option than giving Bosman almost 160 minutes.
It is difficult to comment on the outside backs, other than to say De Villiers defended well and Fourie's try was well executed. Other than that they did not see much of the ball.
The French were good. Not brilliant, but certainly better on the day. Yannick Nyanga and Jean-Baptiste Elissalde were something special and are stars of the future. Frédéric Michalak is quite a general for someone so young. But other than the fact that the French have their traditional flair and punish on the counter attack, the Boks have more star potential.
And that is why this loss is more galling. If the Boks are to challenge the All Blacks for number one, they can only lose to the brilliant performance of an opposition rather than their own sub-standard play. The All Blacks have become clinical. When they play a sub-standard opposition they play the same rugby they dish up against the best. By comparison, it is difficult to know which Bok team will turn up for a match.
4 Comments:
Hi StormSaam
Good breakdown of the game- As a Oranjeman I felt that MC & MB got sacrificed a bit on this tour- but hell life aint no song sometimes.
Good luck with your blog.
Blogspot- influenced me to open up my own - so browse to http://oranjeorakel.blogspot.com
Hi
Thanks for the post- seems that my blog is not so "virgin" anymore.
Please mail me oranje_orakel@hotmail.com.
There is some technicalities that I want to discuss on the composition of the blog- have read the online material- but some of my questions are not yet answered
cheers
Visit www.ruggaworld.blogspot.com for a interim site that is run by the alternative muppits
Agree on Os.
I'm still trying to convince you to write for BokRugby.com.
We need a Province perspective!
Post a Comment
<< Home